Open christinabergmann opened 6 years ago
It's as easy as a checkbox, so I don't see why not, unless we think that they shouldn't be able to do that.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 5:18 AM, Christina Bergmann <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Some people argue against including unpublished data or information from conference abstracts, should we make subsetting to peer reviewed a standard option?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/langcog/metalab2/issues/55, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGul4FoNnk2MIM2KvCC__6Cn36mNN4rks5tcoEcgaJpZM4SkQEG .
OK, should we specify it in the datasets.yaml or make it standard?
I'm working on this but I have a small question regarding the implementation: In order to use subsetting, the variable must be coded as TRUE or FALSE, but at the moment the peer_reviewed column is coded as yes or no. We can either change this manually in the existing datasets (and modify the template for future datasets), or the variable transformation can be done in the code. I think I would prefer the first option (changing the datasets & template), what do you think?
Sounds fine to me, afaik no metalab scripts use this currently.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 17:52, Julia notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm working on this but I have a small question regarding the implementation: In order to use subsetting, the variable must be coded as TRUE or FALSE, but at the moment the peer_reviewed column is coded as yes or no. We can either change this manually in the existing datasets (and modify the template for future datasets), or the variable transformation can be done in the code. I think I would prefer the first option (changing the datasets & template), what do you think?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/langcog/metalab2/issues/55#issuecomment-438734370, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALVmky052mA82NQvAZecsgjq59wcYhHYks5uvEosgaJpZM4SkQEG .
-- Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Language Development Department, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Website: sites.google.com/site/chbergma Blog: cogtales.wordpress.com
Either option sounds fine to me!
Am Mi., 14. Nov. 2018 um 17:52 Uhr schrieb Christina Bergmann < notifications@github.com>:
Sounds fine to me, afaik no metalab scripts use this currently.
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 17:52, Julia notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm working on this but I have a small question regarding the implementation: In order to use subsetting, the variable must be coded as TRUE or FALSE, but at the moment the peer_reviewed column is coded as yes or no. We can either change this manually in the existing datasets (and modify the template for future datasets), or the variable transformation can be done in the code. I think I would prefer the first option (changing the datasets & template), what do you think?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/langcog/metalab2/issues/55#issuecomment-438734370, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALVmky052mA82NQvAZecsgjq59wcYhHYks5uvEosgaJpZM4SkQEG
.
-- Researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Language Development Department, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Website: sites.google.com/site/chbergma Blog: cogtales.wordpress.com
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/langcog/metalab2/issues/55#issuecomment-438734735, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APkTmyP79MORA24TvBW7KS-XS7jt25JJks5uvEpogaJpZM4SkQEG .
-- Postdoctoral Researcher Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, Paris, France Website: https://sites.google.com/site/tsujish/home Blog: https://cogtales.wordpress.com/
Some people argue against including unpublished data or information from conference abstracts, should we make subsetting to peer reviewed a standard option?