Closed mcfrank closed 2 years ago
Our decision is to import JUST the oxford CDI words (not the 30 extra words) and to mark the language background appropriately for these kids. @kachergis might just use the 30 extras for swadesh validation.
Policy for short forms:
item_id
s follow long form (i.e., are not sequential in short forms) @HenryMehta cleaned files are here:
[English_British_OxfordShort].csv EnglishBritishOxfordShort_Floccia_data.csv EnglishBritishOxfordShort_Floccia_fields.csv EnglishBritishOxfordShort_Floccia_values.csv
Note that data file only contains children who have English data
@alvinwmtan is the form_type for OxfordShort WS or WG as defined in #258 ?
@HenryMehta it should be WG—thanks for flagging
@alvinwmtan Available to test
@HenryMehta looks good from R
citation is: Floccia, C., Sambrook, T. D., Luche, C. D., Kwok, R., Goslin, J., White, L., Cattani, A., Sullivan, E., Abbot-Smith, K., Krott, A., Mills, D., Rowland, C., Gervain, J., Plunkett, K., Hoff, E., & Bauer, P. J. (2018). Vocabulary of 2-year-olds learning English and an additional language: Norms and effects of linguistic distance. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 83(1), 1–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12352
contributor: Caroline Floccia, University of Plymouth
Datafile contains wordbank data.xlsx
Contains data on bilinguals for 100 word oxford CDI (production/comprehension) plus 30 words across various languages.
probably needs some codebook support on momed and other fields (or we can try to back this out of the monograph)