Closed TienLD-0801 closed 2 days ago
To address the issue with the "Model Provider" icon not working as expected in Dify version 0.6.11, here are some steps and information that might help:
Rendering Logic: The "Model Provider" icon is rendered using the ModelIcon
component. This component checks if the provider is 'openai' and if the model name starts with 'gpt-4'. If both conditions are met, it renders the OpenaiViolet
icon. Otherwise, it uses the provider.icon_small
property to render an <img>
element with the icon's URL. If neither condition is met, it falls back to a default CubeOutline
icon [1].
CSS and Styling Changes: Recent changes to the CSS and styling of the "Model Provider" icon include specific classes for different states and conditions. For example, the ModelIcon
component has classes like mr-1.5 !w-5 !h-5
, and the SlidersH
icon has conditional classes based on the isInWorkflow
prop [2].
Common Errors and Logs: Common error messages or logs related to the "Model Provider" icon can be found in the server logs where the Flask application is running. Issues might arise from user permissions or icon retrieval failures in the ModelProviderIconApi
class [3].
Functionality and Behavior: The "Model Provider" icon should display the provider's small and large icons, show the provider's label and description, provide access to help information, allow users to manage configuration methods, and indicate supported model types and status [4].
If these steps do not resolve the issue, providing more detailed error messages from the frontend console and any backend error logs, along with your Docker setup details, could help further diagnose the problem.
To continue talking to Dosu, mention @dosu.
Can't reproduce on Cloud, I think this happens when you are trying to run from source code right? Try to clean the browser cache and restart the api service again to see if this persists.
@crazywoola I tried everything but it still doesn't work I think the problem comes from this pull request
Which one. I have encountered this before long time ago, we just released model runtime that time. But it can't be reproduced now.
@crazywoola So is there any way to solve it? I cleared caching like you said but it doesn't work Maybe , Maybe the could urls are not working yet. Ex : https://cloud.dify.ai/console/api/workspaces/current/model-providers/openai/icon_large/en_US?_token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoiZjhiZjMwZDYtZjcwMy00NzRkLTk2NjgtNDAwNGQ4OGQyMTIwIiwiZXhwIjoxNzIyMDU0MTI2LCJpc3MiOiJTRUxGX0hPU1RFRCIsInN1YiI6IkNvbnNvbGUgQVBJIFBhc3Nwb3J0In0.ZjSzZEGDihb4VimBTmY-OzexgItXcrv9t7xbQen1mIQ
Error : {"code": "unauthorized", "message": "Invalid token signature.", "status": 401}
This also happens when self-hosting. It's an issue that occurs when the default values point to their cloud service, which requires a proper token. This doesn't happen with earlier versions, so https://github.com/langgenius/dify/commit/488e3c3d565434bb6988d3d2120f0dfa9cb7fa4b#diff-89fafc265c1fa601cf2364b20be83308031335fda9467fcf3249d5ec1c0c8172 or https://github.com/langgenius/dify/commit/17d2f0bb0d3c7618ed59968613175d2344fcbdc1 or https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/5412 might be related.
It seems its more related how default values are generated for the environment variables. A quick workaround would be to explicitly set the domains yourself:
DOMAIN=https://example.com
CONSOLE_API_URL="$DOMAIN"
CONSOLE_WEB_URL="$DOMAIN"
SERVICE_API_URL="$DOMAIN"
APP_API_URL="$DOMAIN"
APP_WEB_URL="$DOMAIN"
@monotykamary Thank you! The same thing just happened with version 0.6.12 running on my local machine, and setting the domains explicitly just fixed the problem!
@monotykamary @monotykamary good idea , I think it works very well so I will close this issue
Self Checks
Dify version
0.6.11
Cloud or Self Hosted
Cloud, Self Hosted (Docker), Self Hosted (Source)
Steps to reproduce
In the most recent commit update since the time I created the new issue, this icon is not working as expected, please reconsider.
✔️ Expected Behavior
No response
❌ Actual Behavior
No response