Can Microsoft's Graph RAG be added to the new version?

[jeffreychen567]

Self Checks

• [X] I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
• [X] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
• [X] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:）
• [X] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

The current RAG still has numerous deficiencies. Microsoft's Graph RAG could substantially improve RAG capabilities, and I hope it will be incorporated into the next version.

2. Additional context or comments

No response

3. Can you help us with this feature?

• [X] I am interested in contributing to this feature.

[ZuzooVn]

+100

[Sakura4036]

+1, it's really helpful

[hyr910331]

+10086!!

[adam6313]

🔥🔥🔥

[ssrshz]

Yes, it will greatly contribute to Dify!

[ssrshz]

Yes, it will greatly contribute to Dify!

[Tining123]

+1

[like-a-freedom]

+1

[phylony]

+1

[ifsheldon]

+1, a great RAG

[lingaoan2024]

Will the next version include graph rag?

[xinzhics]

mee to,let's do it

[meishild]

+1

[dimsky]

+1

[uenotakeshi1048]

+1

[RGHuang]

Is there any thing we can do to help dify team to support this asap?

[murtaza-motorwala]

This is an absolute needed feature. +100 for this. The ability to search on semantics and relationships would help solve so many use cases.

[varluffy]

+1

[StellarFlash]

a pratical way is making graphrag as a knowledge base service, such as a docker, interacting with standard api.

[simonetoo]

+1

[pulipulichen]

+1

[akuanwo]

+1

[arronwy]

+1

[NiuBlibing]

https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/tree/main/graphrag ragflow support it.

[martinzhang777]

+1k

[xudbin]

why closed？ it will be very useful

[LeoLiuYan]

How is the progress of this feature?

[joeke80215]

+1

[Namec999]

+1

[victorx98]

+1

[NiXuebing]

+1

[sshuair]

+1

[bytewei]

+1

[jqhr]

+1

[weipanux]

+100086

[Thankyou-Cheems]

+1 Killer level feature

[taowang1993]

yes please!

[hackerpayne]

+1000

[nilecui]

+1

[suxuanning]

+10086

[zouxiaodong]

+999999

[nickknyc]

hoping we get support for all cypher-based graph stores - for me particularly neo4j. https://neo4j.com/developer-blog/microsoft-graphrag-neo4j/ with this implementation - would be great to seperate the neo4j stuff from the specific Microsoft graphRag implementation so we can all use graph debases as we like. Really need this to keep up on the RAG front.

[k0286]

+1, this will improve the performance of RAG apps significantly

[chace100]

+100000

[algorithmx]

hoping we get support for all cypher-based graph stores - for me particularly neo4j. https://neo4j.com/developer-blog/microsoft-graphrag-neo4j/ with this implementation - would be great to seperate the neo4j stuff from the specific Microsoft graphRag implementation so we can all use graph debases as we like. Really need this to keep up on the RAG front.

how about this : neo4j-graphrag-python ?

[algorithmx]

hoping we get support for all cypher-based graph stores - for me particularly neo4j. https://neo4j.com/developer-blog/microsoft-graphrag-neo4j/ with this implementation - would be great to seperate the neo4j stuff from the specific Microsoft graphRag implementation so we can all use graph debases as we like. Really need this to keep up on the RAG front.

how about this : neo4j-graphrag-python ?

Just have to merge the UI there into Dify and maybe check the license compatibility

[nickknyc]

sure that would be great.

Sent from Surface Duo

---

From: Yunlong Lian @.> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 10:54:30 PM To: langgenius/dify @.> Cc: Nick Katsivelos @.>; Comment @.> Subject: Re: [langgenius/dify] Can Microsoft's Graph RAG be added to the new version? (Issue #6019)

hoping we get support for all cypher-based graph stores - for me particularly neo4j. https://neo4j.com/developer-blog/microsoft-graphrag-neo4j/ with this implementation - would be great to seperate the neo4j stuff from the specific Microsoft graphRag implementation so we can all use graph debases as we like. Really need this to keep up on the RAG front.

how about this : neo4j-graphrag-pythonhttps://neo4j.com/developer-blog/neo4j-graphrag-python-package/ ?

Just have to merge the UI there into Dify and maybe check the license compatibility

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/6019#issuecomment-2370008843, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAMGI3BF4FNVJFTNISK6PL3ZYDH6NAVCNFSM6AAAAABKNI7YZ2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNZQGAYDQOBUGM. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

[murtaza-motorwala]

@crazywoola - Any update on when this would be done? There are so many users requesting for it. This will be a game changer and it would open doors to so many use cases. RAG + GraphRAG would be a powerful combo.

[brightwang]

I created a video about how to build an AI agent by integrating graphrag and Dify. https://youtu.be/cUtaEkIc65g?si=v1_rnIHZ8CeMppOX

[nhha1602]

Hi, As I understand that: with GraphRAG feature on dify, we will not need to integrate with a graph database ? And one more thing, if we use GraphRAG, how can we use re-rank model for results from Vector database and GraphRAG ?

Thanks and regards