search

langsci / 163

A lexicalist account of argument structure
1 stars 0 forks source link

Test (p. 2) [via PaperHive@docloop] #266

Open docloop[bot] opened 5 years ago

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Regarding this part:

alternative

Stefan Müller wrote:

This is a test. Feel free to comment on it. =:-)

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Remi van Trijp wrote:

Hi Stefan, I will add some comments which are mainly questions / remarks that don't necessarily suggest any changes to your book. I think it is an excellent piece of work which poses many challenges to the constructional account (which I still defend :)), and it is very rare to see someone formalizing accounts in two different approaches. Great to see this in open access as well!

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Stefan Müller wrote:

Thanks! I am all with you with constructional accounts. The question is where to put stuff. I go for lexical constructions rather for phrasal ones. As for formalization: Most of the work on the LFG part was done by Ash, Ida, Mary, Elizabeth Christie and Gianluca Giorgolo. I just imagined what one could do to accommodate certain facts. Yes, open access is great! It makes it possible to have these discussions. The content is ours. We want to use it as we like. =:-)

Link to original comment. About docloop.