search

langsci / 163

A lexicalist account of argument structure
1 stars 0 forks source link

"inserted" (p. 16) [via PaperHive@docloop] #268

Open docloop[bot] opened 5 years ago

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Regarding this part:

inserted

Remi van Trijp wrote:

They are actually "fused" rather than inserted. See Goldberg 1995

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Stefan Müller wrote:

Is there a terminological distinction? Inserted means that something is in something else after the action, doesn't it?

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Remi van Trijp wrote:

Fair enough. Goldberg is not explicit about this. The way I interpret an ASC is that it (almost) never deals with structure-building (or describing hierarchical structure if you prefer a non-procedural way of talking about it), so I don't see them as structures in which you can plug something in.

Link to original comment. About docloop.