search

langsci / 163

A lexicalist account of argument structure
2 stars 0 forks source link

Cite more inclusively in CxG tradition! (p. 11) [via PaperHive@docloop] #293

Open docloop[bot] opened 5 years ago

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Regarding this part:

CxG, Fillmore, Kay & O’Connor 1988 ; Goldberg 1995 ; 2006 ; Tomasello 2003

Laura Michaelis wrote:

null

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Stefan Müller wrote:

I already added some citations in other parts of the document but I think the citation here is standard. One usually points to some key publications. This is what I did.

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Laura Michaelis wrote:

The question is what is considered 'key'.

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Remi van Trijp wrote:

What do you consider as key? My typical candidates (apart from the ones already cited here, though I don't cite Tomasello as a key CxG paper) are: Fillmore 1988, Kay & Fillmore 1999, Fried & Östman 2004, Croft 2001, Michaelis 2006, Hoffman & Trousdale 2013

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Stefan Müller wrote:

OK. This is the maxi version. The book developed out of a journal paper (too long for this). So I did not cite handbook papers but the original things. But in a book it may be better to cite these as well so that the readers get pointers to summaries. Thanks!

Link to original comment. About docloop.