search

langsci / 163

A lexicalist account of argument structure
1 stars 0 forks source link

S-structure is new: A bit misleading (p. 21) [via PaperHive@docloop] #300

Open docloop[bot] opened 5 years ago

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Regarding this part:

The s-structure is a new semantic level

Ash Asudeh wrote:

It's not really true that 's-structure is a new semantic level'. It has been there from the beginning in glue semantics. However, in those treatments, it was not really a *structure* in the technical sense, because the bits were unconnected. It was in Asudeh & Giorgolo (2012) that we first proposed that we could treat s-structure as a properly connected structure and then move a-structure facts to this structure. So the material before and immediately following (10) here is slightly misleading: s-structure is not new and a connected s-structure is not new to AGT, but had rather been proposed by me and Gianluca previously.

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Stefan Müller wrote:

OK. This is sloppy. I compared it with old-style LFG. Say Simpson, 1983. Thanks for pointing this out. Comments are automatically transferred to github and I will fix this later: https://github.com/langsci/163/issues/300

Link to original comment. About docloop.