search

langsci / 163

A lexicalist account of argument structure
2 stars 0 forks source link

Ordering again (p. 30) [via PaperHive@docloop] #305

Open docloop[bot] opened 5 years ago

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Regarding this part:

The resource sensitivity of the glue statements ensures that the glue statements are used in a specific order in the proofs.

Ash Asudeh wrote:

Again, this isn't right. The glue term does not impose an ordering (see above). Rather for us is the fact the constraints, including the glue terms can only be resolved in a way that essentially derives the effects of ordering as a side effect (so our approach is arguably more general) in order to derive a valid glue proof. Again, see page 87 and chapter 5 of Asudeh (2012).

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Stefan Müller wrote:

> The glue term does not impose an ordering (see above). Rather for us is the fact the constraints, including the glue terms can only be resolved in a way that essentially derives the effects of ordering as a side effect (so our approach is arguably more general) in order to derive a valid glue proof. Yes, but this is what I say. Don't I? Because of the resource sensitivity the semantics has to be combined in a certain order. This is similar to the LR: if you apply a rule to a two-place predicate and the result is a three-place predicate, rules looking for two-place predicates cannot apply any longer.

Link to original comment. About docloop.