search

langsci / 163

A lexicalist account of argument structure
2 stars 0 forks source link

No, I don't think so (p. 49) [via PaperHive@docloop] #313

Open docloop[bot] opened 5 years ago

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Regarding this part:

hey do and then there is a missing generalization since active and passive c-structures are unrelated.

Ash Asudeh wrote:

I've written about this at several points now, but I don't think this argument is right.

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Stefan Müller wrote:

I think we have to discuss this further. I commented at the [section about passives](https://paperhive.org/documents/items/CDuBamUa0iWI?a=p:43).

Link to original comment. About docloop.