Reviewer on DG paper: The comment regarding “empty elements” is an interesting one, but one perspective that is not mentioned here is the fact that the empty elements in a version of Minimalism such as Nanosyntax contains potentially relevant phonological and/or semantic information. Under such an approach, there are no “empty elements”, those that do not have a phonological reflex are “rolled up” or “bundled together.” Perhaps this is a point that need not be directly addressed in this piece, but it is worth considering.
Reviewer on DG paper: The comment regarding “empty elements” is an interesting one, but one perspective that is not mentioned here is the fact that the empty elements in a version of Minimalism such as Nanosyntax contains potentially relevant phonological and/or semantic information. Under such an approach, there are no “empty elements”, those that do not have a phonological reflex are “rolled up” or “bundled together.” Perhaps this is a point that need not be directly addressed in this piece, but it is worth considering.