Closed ambadyanands closed 2 years ago
I also back this proposal
FYI @beyang @sqs we state the servers needs to be OSS to be included. This seems like a position we should keep, but ccing you just in case you think it makes sense to change our conditions of inclusion. For now I will accept the revert.
Also cc @juliardi since he added the listing. I'm happy to change the decision after some debate. But for now I am going ahead with the revert.
Although I am an avid supporter of open source, I am a bit baffled by Langserver's policy of only listing open source product. I will abide by your decision, but I hope Langserver can be a resource of information for finding Language Server tools regardless of license.
I hope Langserver can be a resource of information for finding Language Server tools regardless of license.
@juliardi Hi, given that there is already such a list at https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/implementors/servers/, wouldn't that make this project redundant? What makes langserver project important, I believe, is its policies.
@juliardi @ambadyanands hypothetical, if we (Sourcegraph) donated this project to the community where new policies and governance could be established would this help the move this project forward?
Hi,
First of all thanks for this community-driven project. At langserver.org, it states that the servers and clients must be fully open-source in order to qualify to be included on the list. Listing intelephense server violates this condition and I kindly request to remove the same by reverting https://github.com/langserver/langserver.github.io/commit/b6f8a1ded331233a107f991b7f8efb5d6cb331cc. Thanks again.