coderabbitai[bot]
commented
2 weeks ago Walkthrough
The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the disambiguation.xml file for Portuguese language rules in LanguageTool. A new rule has been added to the RARE_POS group to handle specific verb forms, along with updates to existing rules to refine patterns and exceptions. Additionally, a commented-out rule group related to sentence tokenization has been removed. These alterations aim to enhance the disambiguation logic for verb forms and improve the overall accuracy of the rules.
Changes
| File Path | Change Summary |
|---|---|
| languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml | - Added a new rule in the RARE_POS group for specific verb forms. - Updated an existing rule with a new exception pattern. - Removed a commented-out rule group related to sentence tokenization. - Minor adjustments to existing rules for improved accuracy. |
Possibly related issues
- languagetool-org/languagetool#10954: The changes in this PR address verb disambiguation issues, which are directly related to the problems mentioned in this open issue regarding false positives in verb/noun usage.
Possibly related PRs
- #10868: Introduces a new rule in
disambiguation.xmlfor Portuguese focusing on verb patterns, similar to the changes made in this PR. - #10901: Improves a rule in
disambiguation.xmlrelated to verb patterns, indicating a direct connection to this PR. - #10926: Addresses false positives in
disambiguation.xmlrelated to verbs, aligning with the enhancements made in this PR. - #10957: Focuses on improvements to the disambiguator for handling
RARE_POS, directly relevant to this PR's changes. - #10977: Modifies the
RARE_POSrule indisambiguation.xml, enhancing specificity related to updates made in this PR. - #10986: Makes significant improvements to the
RARE_POSrule indisambiguation.xml, directly aligning with the enhancements described in this PR.
Suggested reviewers
- jaumeortola
- p-goulart
📜 Recent review details
**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0e7e56087f5a4163254dd93404c4d879e66dc1f and e3369c22a7579da91860c80496bceaee15ea5b41.📒 Files selected for processing (1)
* `languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml` (2 hunks)🔇 Additional comments (2)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (2)
`254-266`: **LGTM! The new rule enhances disambiguation for verb-noun ambiguity.** The rule effectively handles cases where words could be interpreted as either verbs or nouns, particularly in the context of special pronouns. The comment indicates that this has been verified with ChatGPT 4 for 3217 results. Let's verify the impact of this rule: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new rule's pattern matches and its potential impact # Search for cases where the rule might apply rg -A 5 'postag="V.+" postag_regexp="yes".*postag="NC.+" postag_regexp="yes"' || echo "No matching cases found" # Look for any existing rules that might conflict rg -B 5 -A 5 'action="remove" postag="V\.\+"' || echo "No conflicting rules found" ``` --- `243-243`: **LGTM! The pattern helps prevent false positives in verb detection.** The added pattern correctly excludes common parts of speech that could be mistaken for verbs, improving disambiguation accuracy. Let's verify the impact of this change:✅ Verification successful
The search results show that the pattern is consistent with similar disambiguation rules in Portuguese and other Romance languages (Spanish and Catalan). The pattern helps distinguish between verbs and other parts of speech, particularly in cases where words can have multiple interpretations. Let me verify one more aspect to ensure the exceptions are properly aligned with the Portuguese language's tagging scheme: --- The search results confirm that the pattern and its exceptions are consistent with Portuguese language's tagging scheme. The pattern `🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential cases where the new pattern might affect verb detection # Look for cases where words are tagged with multiple POS including verbs and the excluded categories # Search for words with multiple POS tags including verbs rg -A 2 'postag="[^"]*V[^"]*,[^"]*(?:CS|RG|NC|AQ|CC|SPS|[DP])[^"]*"' || echo "No problematic cases found" ``` Length of output: 10432 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Check the tagset used in Portuguese rules and dictionaries rg -A 2 'postag="(?:CS|RG|NC|AQ|CC|SPS|[DP])[^"]*"' languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/ || echo "No matching patterns found" # Also check for any existing similar patterns in Portuguese rules rg -A 2 'Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Hello!
Another major enhancement and also fixed:
“Ele a ama e ela o ama também.”“ele” and “ela” were being detected as a verb, thus incorrectly removing the “ama” verb.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores