Closed marcoagpinto closed 8 months ago
@marcoagpinto do you mind fixing fusé-lo
for pt-BR.aff
as well, since you know what rule it is? :p I suppose if you copied it from pt-BR
it's also wrong there.
Also I think maybe [^f]
is overkill. Surely just por
would be enough? This pattern is exclusive to .+por -> .+puser
.
@marcoagpinto do you mind fixing
fusé-lo
forpt-BR.aff
as well, since you know what rule it is? :p I suppose if you copied it frompt-BR
it's also wrong there.Also I think maybe
[^f]
is overkill. Surely justpor
would be enough? This pattern is exclusive to.+por -> .+puser
.
Ahhhhh… that is exactly what I was thinking about, fixing the pt-BR rule too.
Give me 20 minutes for some testing.
@p-goulart
I screwed up!
I thought I had the most recent pt-BR .AFF, so I tried to replace mine with the one on the repository and it was very different.
Maybe you can change it directly?
It is the lines:
SFX r or usé-la por
SFX r or usé-las por
SFX r or usé-lo por
SFX r or usé-los por
Just search for:
SFX r or usé-la
And you will find them.
I pressed CANCEL in the pull request window of TortoiseGit and I can't get back the pt-BR. AFF
I opened another branch, I couldn't undo what I did.
Heya, @susanaboatto and @p-goulart
Here is a new set of rules for irregular verbs pt-PT.
Almost 200 new forms have been added.
According to the e-mail reply of Pedro, I have fixed the rule for:
Those four verbal forms have been removed:
I added:
[^f]
and only these four were affected.Thanks!