Closed odow closed 1 year ago
@harshangrjn take a look. It's a bit wasteful, but the easiest option is to try and instantiate the solver then ask for SolverName
.
There's also a bunch of old code floating around that isn't doing what you think.
I see you commented this block:
# if m.mip_solver_id != :Gurobi
# Alp.get_option(m, :convhull_warmstart) == false
# Alp.get_option(m, :convhull_no_good_cuts) == false
# end
but it was comparing a string against a symbol, so it was always true, and then it was using get_option
instead of set_option
?
Ideally, you wouldn't need any solver-specific functionality in Alpine.
@odow I was about to delete those lines of get_option
as they weren't doing what they had to. Also, the reason we need solver specific functionality is because there are certain features which are accessible by only certain solvers. For example, in collecting solution pool in Gurobi, or in being able to include a multi warm-start in local solver like Ipopt. But I agree that eventually it is better to have solver-independent methods in Alpine. Are you ok if I merge these changes with #212, or if we bring in the ones from there, that's fine too.
Merging #213 (5552797) into solver_identifier_issue (8a15424) will increase coverage by
0.05%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## solver_identifier_issue #213 +/- ##
===========================================================
+ Coverage 86.38% 86.43% +0.05%
===========================================================
Files 16 16
Lines 3195 3193 -2
===========================================================
Hits 2760 2760
+ Misses 435 433 -2
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/MOI_wrapper/MOI_wrapper.jl | 86.47% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/algorithm.jl | 89.16% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
src/utility.jl | 84.46% <100.00%> (+0.63%) |
:arrow_up: |
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
Are you ok if I merge these changes with https://github.com/lanl-ansi/Alpine.jl/pull/212, or if we bring in the ones from there, that's fine too.
Yes, it should be set up for you to merge this into #212
Ah. We were working over top of each other: https://github.com/lanl-ansi/Alpine.jl/pull/212/commits/8a1542465bcc81ad6ce9982521b03745735e84b0