Closed rfbird closed 4 years ago
Howdy Bob, Saw this and got worried. Are you adding the capability to have a global particle index while also retaining the local p->i index in the particle struct? I hope so. BTW, is this the right way to comment on a GitHub commit? Seems a bit different from the past scenario where you have requested me to review pull requests, etc. Thanks, Dave
@dnystrom1 yea this is a fine way to comment on github, especially if you want to specifically address my work to extend the file IO to support HDF5
I have two branches currently:
This one -- where comments relating to "global id" are just so when we write the value of p->i
(the particles cell) it's unique in global space
global_particle_id -- that adds a separate SoA that stores a globally unique id per particle
It sounds like you're referring to the second above, got but got scared by comment referring to the (unrelated) first?
Neither change at all how p->i
functions and can be used
OK. Thanks. Good to know.
Replace by #80
Codecov Report
87.01% <ø> (+0.34%)
100% <100%> (ø)
67.08% <100%> (+0.08%)
38.96% <50%> (+2.47%)
60.74% <0%> (-0.94%)
28.35% <0%> (ø)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.