[Feature] Add getQuery Method

[mohaphez]

• Implemented the getQuery method.
• Updated FieldsContract.
• Added the getQuery method to ZeusDataSources stub.

Caution: This may result in breaking changes in certain programs.

[what-the-diff[bot]]

PR Summary

• Modification to DataSource Contract Added a piece of necessary code (use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Builder;) in Contracts/DataSource.php to enable advanced interaction with our database.

• Enhancement to DataSource Contract Added a new function (public function getQuery(): Builder) to Contracts/DataSource.php. This method will allow the application to make more specific and efficient interactions with our database.

• Refactoring FieldsContract Updated the method of accessing data in Fields/FieldsContract.php, shifting from using getModel() to the newly added getQuery(). This makes data access more streamlined and efficient.

• Added Builder capability to stub The stubs/ZeusDataSources.stub now also includes the ability to interact with the database in advanced ways (use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Builder;).

• Enhancement to stub A similar function to make specific database interactions (public function getQuery(): Builder) was added to stubs/ZeusDataSources.stub to ensure it has the same capabilities as our primary modules.

[mohaphez]

I also introduced the Collection data type, enabling users to utilize data as a collection. For instance, a list of items from an enum can be utilized as a feed.

public function getQuery(): Builder|Collection
{
    return collect(LanguageEnum::getAllValuesWithLabel());
}

[atmonshi]

thank you @mohaphez, really appreciate your work

what if we implement the getQuery to the DataSourceContract so there wont be any breaking changes, I think :) can you test that.

thank you again.

[mohaphez]

Hi dear @atmonshi,

You're absolutely right! That's an excellent point. I've removed getQuery from ZeuseDataSource.stub and added it to DataSourceContract. Additionally, I've replaced getModel with getQuery in getCollectionsValuesForResponse within FieldsContract.

Thanks.