laravel / framework

The Laravel Framework.
https://laravel.com
MIT License
32.51k stars 11.01k forks source link

Duplicate entries on updateOrCreate #19372

Closed chimit closed 7 years ago

chimit commented 7 years ago

Description:

I want to save mobile devices information in the database using their UUIDs. The uuid field has a unique index. The code is:

$device = Device::updateOrCreate(
    ['uuid' => $request->input('uuid')],
    [
        'info' => $request->input('info'),
    ]
);

But I'm getting a lot of errors in logs:

Next Doctrine\DBAL\Driver\PDOException: SQLSTATE[23000]: Integrity constraint violation: 1062 Duplicate entry 'aa18269c-cf32-4c6b-b450-e84a5dba0a0c' for key 'devices_device_uuid_unique' in /var/www/api/vendor/doctrine/dbal/lib/Doctrine/DBAL/Driver/PDOStatement.php:93
Stack trace:

I also tried to use firstOrNew:

$device = Device::firstOrNew(['uuid' => $request->input('uuid')]);
$device->info = $request->input('info');
$device->save();

But it's equal I guess.

If I remove the unique index from the uuid field the problem is gone but I get duplicate entries. That's strange because I thought updateOrCreate method guarantees uniqueness of the entries.

Is it a bug of the updateOrCreate method?

Kyslik commented 7 years ago

Whats your database structure, share migration for the table.

srmklive commented 7 years ago

Can you share your database structure or migration file for the table?

chimit commented 7 years ago
Schema::create('devices', function (Blueprint $table) {
    $table->increments('id');
    $table->integer('user_id')->unsigned()->nullable();
    $table->string('uuid')->unique();
    $table->timestamps();
});
themsaid commented 7 years ago

Since it happens on random occasions I believe it might be a race condition with the record is being created via another request in between the check and insert inside updateOrCreate().

Reaper45 commented 7 years ago

Well. I think this is a Laravel mass assignment Issue. When using the Eloquent create method, you will need to specify either a fillable or guarded attribute on the model, as all Eloquent models protect against mass-assignment by default. In your case @chimit: add this to your device.php model

public $fillable = ['uuid', 'info'];

I put the solution code here.

chimit commented 7 years ago

Hi @Reaper45! I already have it in my Device model otherwise I would get Mass Assignment exceptions. The problem is that updateOrCreate method doesn't really guarantee what it was created for. Maybe this method should be improved, for example, using transactions.

themsaid commented 7 years ago

updateOrCreate method doesn't really guarantee what it was created for. Maybe this method should be improved, for example, using transactions.

Feel free to open a PR if you have a better idea, meanwhile I'm closing this since it's not actually a bug.

alessandrolattao commented 7 years ago

I am having the exact same problem. If at least two requests happen simultaneously, updateOrCreate does not behave correctly. You can easily reproduce the problem by using ab (apache bench) by using this command: ab -n 2 -c 2 http://your.url.here (I used a GET request for testing purpose). This generates two simultaneous requests to the "update url" and lead eloquent to generate two insert queries.

lk77 commented 7 years ago

i think you could use lock to prevent simultaneous calls.


Device::where(['uuid'` => $request->input('uuid')]->lock(true);
//your code
Device::where(['uuid' => $request->input('uuid')]->lock(false); 

or something like that i've not tested it.

alessandrolattao commented 7 years ago

Yes, I could. But that would force me to add locks everywhere to handle updateOrCreate problems. I think the function should be atomic. :)

rajjanorkar commented 6 years ago

this is still problem.

didioh commented 6 years ago

I solved this problem by overriding Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model and creating a custom firstOrCreate method that returns the model if there is a duplicate error exception. This should work for mySQL connections.

class SystemModel extends Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model
{
    /**
    * Check if Illuminate\Database\QueryException is Duplicate Entry Exception.
    *
    * @param  array  $attributes
    * @return \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model
    */
    protected function isDuplicateEntryException(Illuminate\Database\QueryException $e){
        $errorCode  = $e->errorInfo[1];
        if ($errorCode === 1062) { // Duplicate Entry error code
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }

    /**
    * Get the first record matching the attributes or create it.
    *
    * @param  array  $attributes
    * @param  array  $values
    * @return \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model
    */
    public static function firstOrCreate(array $attributes, array $values = [])
    {
        try {           
            $static = (new static);
            return $static->create($attributes + $values);
        } catch (Illuminate\Database\QueryException $e){
            if($static->isDuplicateEntryException($e)) {
                return $static->where($attributes)->first();
            }
        }
    }
}
paulrrogers commented 6 years ago

Please reopen this ticket. I'd agree with other commenters that this is an actual bug since it is surprising behavior for any moderately busy service where collisions are possible. While the implementation does not concern me the syntax implies it is somehow atomic.

This could be achieved in a variety of ways:

In my opinion firstOrCreate also has this weakness and likely any ...OrCreate method.

All that said, I can see why the ...OrNew methods cannot be atomic since they only return unsaved, dirty objects. The others do not have that restriction.

cg-rsands commented 6 years ago

@themsaid this really is a bug. Race conditions are a big problem with updateOrCreate. We are fighting this at present, upsert is a safe method with mysql

alessandro-aglietti commented 6 years ago

Manage race conditions manually when using updateOrCreate with an ORM in 21st century?? C'mon!

themsaid commented 6 years ago

Guys, please open a PR if you have a different approach that works on all supported database engines :) PRs are welcomed.

aligajani commented 6 years ago

This is still a problem, albeit occurs very rarely.

msdavid1296 commented 6 years ago

Still, I am getting the same issue.

(3/3) QueryException SQLSTATE[23000]: Integrity constraint violation: 1062 Duplicate entry '344b879b-279d-f8e2-01e2-59083ac6f538' for key 'employee_id_unique' (SQL: insert into employee (id, title, first_name, last_name, office_phone, department, mobile, fax, primary_address, city, state, country, postal_code, email, back_account, citizenship, dob, doe, gender, salary, type_of_employeement, employee_no, is_sync, updated_at, created_at) values (344b879b-279d-f8e2-01e2-59083ac6f538, , Vitali, Berby, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , male, , , , 1, 2018-07-30 03:48:35, 2018-07-30 03:48:35))

flexgrip commented 6 years ago

I too am having this issue. For now, the only solution seems to be the old long form method of checking if there's an instance of the model, if not then create a new one, fill it, save, etc. Super inconvenient.

I'm not even sure how this is happening on my end. I don't think the calls are happening close enough together to cause the duplicates. Anyway, just hoping there's a better solution soon. Thanks.

mst101 commented 6 years ago

@didioh 's approach works for me, as does adding a trait to the affected Model to override the updateOrCreate and firstOrCreate methods, as described here.

I agree with others that this should be default behaviour.

whande1992 commented 6 years ago

I have a problem that may be the cause of your problem.

My table has an id column, language and description, I'm running the method for validating the id and language. To insert everything occurs perfectly.

ID| LANGUAGE | DESCRIPTION 1 1____language description 1 1 2____language description 2 1 _3____language description 3

The problem occurs when it is updated, when sending to update id= 1 language= 3 description= updating language 3

description :: updateOrCreate (['id' => 1, 'language' => 3],              ['description' => 'updating language 3'] );

it will be like this

ID | LANGUAGE | DESCRIPTION 11____ updating language 3 12____ lupdating language 3 1_3____ updating language 3

Laravel 5.6

Gogtsu commented 6 years ago

39164774_1652775314847989_5528931938674409472_n

ghost commented 6 years ago

I had the same issue. I found a situation in which $added_products would contain records with the same primary key as records in DB.

$order->order_products()->createMany($added_products);

So (because there isn't updateOrCreateMany()) I changed this to:

foreach($added_products as $added_product) {
    $order->order_products()->updateOrCreate($added_product);
}

But that didn't work. Then I figured out that I hadn't specified the $primaryKey in the model file. After I added protected $primaryKey = ['order_id', 'product_id']; to the model file, it still didn't work because apparently Laravel supporting composite primary keys would make Eloquent too complex.

My solution, with composite primary key support

foreach($added_products as $added_product) {
    // $order->order_products()->updateOrCreate($added_product);
    \Helper::updateOrCreate($order->order_products(), $added_product);
}

And in the helper class:

public static function updateOrCreate($object, $attributes) {
    $primaryKey = [];
    $modelPrimaryKey = (array)$object->getRelated()->getKeyName();

    $attributes_withParentKey = $attributes;
    $attributes_withParentKey[$object->getForeignKeyName()] = $object->getParentKey();

    $values = $attributes; // without primary key

    foreach($modelPrimaryKey as $field) {
        $primaryKey[$field] = $attributes_withParentKey[$field];
        unset($values[$field]);
    }

    DB::transaction(function() use(&$object, $primaryKey, $values, $attributes) {
        // if record exists
        if (DB::table($object->getRelated()->getTable())->where($primaryKey)->first()) {
            // can't do $object->update($attributes) because one part of the PK would be in $attributes
            DB::table($object->getRelated()->getTable())->where($primaryKey)->update($values);
        } else {
            $object->create($attributes);
        }
    }, 5);
}

Also, Query\Builder::updateOrInsert() seems vulnerable to race conditions:

public function updateOrInsert(array $attributes, array $values = [])
{
    if (! $this->where($attributes)->exists()) {
        return $this->insert(array_merge($attributes, $values));
    }
    return (bool) $this->take(1)->update($values);
}

Shouldn't the method use DB::transaction? What if the record get deleted between ! $this->where($attributes)->exists() and $this->insert(array_merge($attributes, $values))?

amenk commented 6 years ago

This might be of help: Maybe we should make a pullrequest for this trait?

https://gist.github.com/troatie/def0fba42fcfb70f873b7f033fbe255f

Yismen commented 5 years ago

Just remove your foreign key from the $fillable array property and it will work. Foreign key should not be mass assigned. It worked for me.

sweebee commented 5 years ago

I've got (sometimes) the same issue:

                Product::updateOrCreate(
                    ['catalog_id' => $row['catalog_id'], 'product_code' => $row['product_code']],
                    $row
                );

only the ID is guarded but sometimes it adds duplicates.

ludo237 commented 5 years ago

It's a race condition you should leverage the lock logic.

tonviet712 commented 5 years ago

I've got the same issue (sometimes): SQLSTATE[23000]: Integrity constraint violation: 1062 Duplicate entry

litlife commented 5 years ago

I've also got the same rarely random issue when use updateOrCreate SQLSTATE[23505]: Unique violation: 7 ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint Laravel Version: 5.8 PHP Version: 7.3.5 Database version: PostgreSQL 10.7 (Ubuntu 10.7-1.pgdg14.04+1)

staudenmeir commented 5 years ago

I've created an UPSERT package for all databases: https://github.com/staudenmeir/laravel-upsert

gbwashleybrown commented 5 years ago

Yeah, this is definitely still a problem. Whats the point in an updateORcreate method if it does the exact opposite

msztorc commented 5 years ago

Methods firstOrCreate and updateOrCreate are totally unusable for real application which allows simultaneous requests. Solve this or rename to firstOrDuplicate. 😃

eduardodallmann commented 5 years ago

Same problem

bhuvidya commented 5 years ago

I must admit I'm kinda stunned this hasn't been fixed natively in the Eloquent codebase. I've reverted to using a trait on my model classes that that wraps a "create advisory lock" mysql call around updateOrCreate() and firstOrCreate() - but it's a hack and will only work for MySQL.

bhuvidya commented 5 years ago

At the very least the docs should be explicit that these methods are not implemented using native database SQL queries, and are therefore not "transaction safe".

duq commented 5 years ago

Guys, please open a PR if you have a different approach that works on all supported database engines :) PRs are welcomed.

Is it possible to have different fixes for different database engines with the same outcome?

We should at least update the docs with a warning about using firstOrCreate/updateOrCreate methods: https://laravel.com/docs/5.8/eloquent#inserting-and-updating-models

aligajani commented 5 years ago

Let’s tweet to TO

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:01 AM Peter Duda notifications@github.com wrote:

Guys, please open a PR if you have a different approach that works on all supported database engines :) PRs are welcomed.

Is it possible to have different fixes for different database engines with the same outcome?

We should at least update the docs with a warning about using firstOrCreate/updateOrCreate methods: https://laravel.com/docs/5.8/eloquent#inserting-and-updating-models

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/laravel/framework/issues/19372?email_source=notifications&email_token=AANGRWRAIAD6E7D5E5V2LODP73UYPA5CNFSM4DNCNYI2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD2DWDMY#issuecomment-512188851, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANGRWS4E4LG3DOSX4SUFJLP73UYPANCNFSM4DNCNYIQ .

--

Ali Gajani Founder at Mr. Geek www.mrgeek.me www.aligajani.com

novaknole commented 5 years ago

I think, if you use index and have updateorcreate method, and put that inside try catch block, all is good.

Imagine two threads both enter the if statement. So both of them are gonna write into the database. when one will start inserting it, the table will be locked for the other one. So first one gets inserted, and another one waits. when first is done and second one starts inserting, it's gonna throw exception of duplicate event entries. YOu got the catch block right? so you catch it and nothing is a problem.

hxgdzyuyi commented 5 years ago

Is it possible to use INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE Syntax ?

staudenmeir commented 5 years ago

@hxgdzyuyi Please see https://github.com/laravel/ideas/issues/1090#issuecomment-377351778 why that is not a universal solution for updateOrCreate().

waleedakhlaq commented 5 years ago

how to avoid a duplicate entry in a db row?

idezigns commented 5 years ago

Just remove your foreign key from the $fillable array property and it will work. Foreign key should not be mass assigned. It worked for me.

This worked for me, my primary 'id' key is the only unique key in my table, once I removed this from fillable assignment in model it worked.

kcassam commented 4 years ago

Is this solution valid ?:

try {                
    $program = Program::updateOrCreate(['key' => $key], [...]);
} catch (PDOException $e) {
    // race condition, let's retry
    $program = Program::updateOrCreate(['key' => $key], [...]);
}
comtelindodev commented 4 years ago

is this fixed ? cause I got the same problem, Laravel 6

amirasyraf commented 4 years ago

Problem still exists. Laravel 7.5.2

simonmaass commented 4 years ago

can confirm issue still present

driesvints commented 4 years ago

Please open a new issue with steps to reproduce.