Closed cosmastech closed 3 weeks ago
Thanks for submitting a PR!
Note that draft PR's are not reviewed. If you would like a review, please mark your pull request as ready for review in the GitHub user interface.
Pull requests that are abandoned in draft may be closed due to inactivity.
Drafting pending review from @timacdonald
@cosmastech, I have re-worked this one. There were a few problems with the original implementation. The main issue was when a value was resolved for a bad type, it was saved to the database.
The new implementation does the check before attempting to resolve. Supports union and intersection types.
What do you think?
Feature::for($scope)->all()
and Feature::for($scope)->loadAll()
will now only return or load the features for that scope type.
@cosmastech, I have re-worked this one. There were a few problems with the original implementation. The main issue was when a value was resolved for a bad type, it was saved to the database.
The new implementation does the check before attempting to resolve. Supports union and intersection types.
What do you think?
Feature::for($scope)->all()
andFeature::for($scope)->loadAll()
will now only return or load the features for that scope type.
Thanks for working on this @timacdonald. Sad you removed my given-when-then 😆 but otherwise, nice.
I didn't run any local testing on this, but it seems to solve the problem. Good catch on the DB queries, didn't consider that fact.
This should resolve https://github.com/laravel/pennant/issues/112
We are building a feature flags endpoint for our mobile and web consumers. We need to be able to get all features for 3-4 scopes which are related to the user, but not the user object itself.
I ran into this exact issue earlier today. I saw that this issue had been open for a few weeks without a PR so I figured I'd take a stab at it.
Given we have features defined for different scopes
When we attempt to load all features for a particular scope
Then we expect to receive feature flag definitions ONLY for that apply to Users.
Currently, however, an exception is thrown: TypeError: Tests\Feature\DatabaseDriverTest::Tests\Feature{closure}(): Argument #1 ($t) must be of type Workbench\App\Models\Team, Workbench\App\Models\User given, called in /Users/luke/Projects/laravel-pennant/src/Drivers/Decorator.php on line 173
Non-goals of this PR
One outstanding question is: do we expect to allow for union or intersection types in the resolving function? Like
Feature::define('team-or-user-feature', fn(Team|User $v) => true);
Seems like this probably wouldn't work with how scopes are set up in general. I am sure that my change will not work in this case.Also, you can still call
Feature::for($user)->activate('team-scoped-feature');
I believe that ideally there would be a guard for this, but it seems like it's beyond the scope of this PR.