Closed opensdh closed 5 years ago
YES, in my opinion at least. I like minimally cluttered verbiage and relatively "flat" name hierarchies where possible.
YES, in my opinion at least. I like minimally cluttered verbiage and relatively "flat" name hierarchies where possible.
You'll really like one of my next pull requests, then…
Rebased to resolve (trivial) merge conflicts.
Now merely merges the contents of task.hh
in, leaving context_t::instance()
alone since @tuxfan said he wanted that to remain ugly (to discourage casual use).
The existing interface is just forwarders for
context_t
functions, which can instead be exposed by givingflecsi::runtime::context_t::instance()
the easier name offlecsi::context()
(as opposed toflecsi::runtime::context
, the base class).execution.hh
would then be nothing but an#include
ofruntime/backend.hh
to get that function, so renametask.hh
to it.