Open rickmark opened 1 year ago
With regards to 2, There has been work to create a language server implementation, although that development hasn't gotten that far.
For the title and 1), this is something that could well be added in the tools
directory of lark
. You can start work on that, it will probably be added.
Suggestion Lark is a clear and simple way to express a grammar, but since the age of TextMate, language definitions have been in the form of
tmLanguage
JSON files. We should either 1) build a way to express.lark
files intotmLanguage
files, or drive the feature into IDEs to support.lark
for syntax highlighting.1) Seems the most pragmatic path, but requires mapping a new concept of "contexts" into the existing lark system.
2) Seems a better long term approach, but requires moving the community and likely is simpler after 1
Describe alternatives you've considered A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.