Closed stellabelin closed 1 year ago
Hi Stella! I believe you're right. Very embarrassing. Thanks for letting me know!
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 10:49, Stella Belin @.***> wrote:
Hi, thanks for your work with this library! When updating to lark 1.1.6 we started getting issues with our parser, and after digging I noticed that it's possible this line inputs the wrong variable: https://github.com/lark-parser/lark/blob/e4df0249c489d20c64222fd293b5cca4c3be4f27/lark/parse_tree_builder.py#L65 It should use last_meta instead of first_meta, right? When I tried changing it our parser worked as expected.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/lark-parser/lark/issues/1304, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFSSSBUHLHIFJVVL25IJBTXRDWHVANCNFSM6AAAAAA2RCTMXY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Fixed and released 1.1.7
Thanks again!
Great, thank you the fix and the quick response!
Hi, thanks for your work with this library! When updating to lark 1.1.6 we started getting issues with our parser, and after digging I noticed that it's possible this line inputs the wrong variable: https://github.com/lark-parser/lark/blob/e4df0249c489d20c64222fd293b5cca4c3be4f27/lark/parse_tree_builder.py#L65 It should use
last_meta
instead offirst_meta
, right? When I tried changing it our parser worked as expected.