Closed ruv closed 8 years ago
Sorry, just sloppiness. It really should be umin
. But I suppose it doesn't matter much, because strings rarely are that long.
Yes, strings themselves are usually not so long. Negative length can be result of a bug in calculations with address arithmetic.
Why do you use
min
but notumin
in the code like the following:: name, ( a u -- ) #name min dup c, tuck move, offset, ;
Here
min
protects against too longu
, but not from negativeu
(or very long positive ;).