Closed ghost closed 8 years ago
there should be a ligature for =:= already
ligature
without
Do you have a specific idea as to how a ligature could improve =/= ?
The mathematical not-equals symbol would make sense for =/=.
@tuncer we should consider also ligatures for !== that may also be rendered as 3-width non-equality symbol, see the recent discussion in #25
Okay, closing this one, then.
=/=
and=:=
are part of Erlang syntax.=/=
and/=
have different semantics in Erlang (as do==
and=:=
), so displaying the same ligature for both would be wrong.