Closed xinitrc86 closed 4 years ago
This is the one ;)
overall looks good to me, more options for the users are good, when its non-breaking
@xinitrc86 thanks, sorry about the delay, just ping me if I take too long time
if I merge this, do you have time for questions if someone runs into trouble?
Hi Lars, Sure thing, specially if I'm mentioned ;)
Regards, Felipe
thanks 👍
Hello Lars, Good afternoon. This is to fix issue #24, my idea was to be the least disruptive and keep syntax to old elements. This also fix #45 (broken tests) and adds a new one for this feature.
Basically I added a new structure to the meta.
And calling a handle_response on json_reply that will eventually:
DATA lv_length TYPE i. DATA lv_minus_data TYPE i. lv_length = strlen( cv_data_as_string ). lv_minus_data = lv_length - 9.
IF lv_minus_data <= 0. RETURN. ENDIF. "start has |{"DATA":| (8) end has |}| (1) cv_data_as_string = cv_data_as_string+8(lv_minus_data). Regards, Felipe