Open pokrakam opened 1 week ago
Q: Is this by bug or design? I guess design, assumption being that anything in the source tree could be called dynamically, correct?
Example,
PROGRAM zrun. START-OF-SELECTION. WRITE / 'Hello, World!'.
will include all classes in the merge:
REPORT zrun. CLASS zcl_foo DEFINITION DEFERRED. CLASS zcl_foo DEFINITION. PUBLIC SECTION. METHODS run. PROTECTED SECTION. PRIVATE SECTION. ENDCLASS. CLASS zcl_foo IMPLEMENTATION. METHOD run. WRITE / 'Hello, World!'. " INCLUDE zhello. ENDMETHOD. ENDCLASS. START-OF-SELECTION. WRITE / 'Hello, World!'. **************************************************** INTERFACE lif_abapmerge_marker. * abapmerge 0.16.4 - 2024-10-14T13:41:02.173Z CONSTANTS c_merge_timestamp TYPE string VALUE `2024-10-14T13:41:02.173Z`. CONSTANTS c_abapmerge_version TYPE string VALUE `0.16.4`. ENDINTERFACE. ****************************************************
Would it make sense to have something like --exclude-unused ? (Assuming it's not a mountain of effort).
--exclude-unused
Most of the classes in abapgit is not "used", so its by design. Can add a flag tho
Q: Is this by bug or design? I guess design, assumption being that anything in the source tree could be called dynamically, correct?
Example,
will include all classes in the merge:
Would it make sense to have something like
--exclude-unused
? (Assuming it's not a mountain of effort).