Closed vitorenesduarte closed 7 years ago
Does this break @junghunyoo's implementation?
Not sure, but I don't think so. #74 probably did break something, but it should be easy to fix.
Hrm, this was merged with no review. Do these changes break compatibility with the Lasp code?
@gyounes I would appreciate waiting for the CI to pass before just merging the code: this is the point of having continuous integration. This is a library that is used by more people than just the LightKone folks.
I asked @gyounes to review this and CI tests passed.
I had a PR in Lasp that fixes compatibility problem: Type:delta
API changed.
I'm just saying that prior to the CI passing it was merged according to GitHub.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:16 PM Vitor Enes notifications@github.com wrote:
I asked @gyounes https://github.com/gyounes to review this and CI tests passed. I had a PR in Lasp that fixes compatibility problem: Type:delta API changed.
— You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/lasp-lang/types/pull/80#issuecomment-303975826, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACvizgzA_7xLslFjtBrOsbDMy9jvJqoks5r9VUSgaJpZM4Mjtbq .
@cmeiklejohn You are totally right. That was a bit reckless from my side.
dot_set
,dot_fun
anddot_map
from data type statestate_gmap
andstate_pair
)