Closed kritchie closed 1 year ago
This PR fixes the condition comparing the imfNo to the max_imf amount.
imfNo
max_imf
From the documentation, the method is supposed to return max_imf amount of IMFs, while currently returning that number +1.
(Either this change, or an update to the docs would be required. I will leave it to the reviewers to determine which one is more suitable for this.)
Sorry for the noise, I just realized based on the tests that this might be expected. However I still think the documentation should be updated to be more explicit about this. I will re-open a cleaner one.
This PR fixes the condition comparing the
imfNo
to themax_imf
amount.From the documentation, the method is supposed to return
max_imf
amount of IMFs, while currently returning that number +1.(Either this change, or an update to the docs would be required. I will leave it to the reviewers to determine which one is more suitable for this.)