Closed igreil closed 2 years ago
please always make a complete example. That makes it easier to test. But beside this. Why are you setting the creation date? That is normally not needed.
Because I am control freak, probably :-) … That said, it's supposedly legal and I've done it in my previous setup, i.e. without using pdfmanagement-testphase
. I have been unable to attach a full .tex file to show the behavior, so I am resorting to copy & paste:
% !TeX program = lualatex
\RequirePackage{pdfmanagement-testphase}
\DeclareDocumentMetadata{pdfstandard=A-2U}
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{hyperxmp}
\usepackage[pdfa]{hyperref}
\newcommand*{\MyAuthor}{Nomen Nescio}
\newcommand*{\MyDate}{D:19801201000000+01'00'}
\hypersetup{
pdftitle={Foobar},
pdfauthor={\MyAuthor},
pdfcreationdate={\MyDate},
pdfmoddate={D:19801201000000+01'00'},
}
\pdfvariable omitcidset=1
\begin{document}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetaur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
\end{document}
well creationdate should show the date when the pdf was created, if you change it, you are basically lying. We use that for regression tests to get reproducible results but real documents shouldn't need it.
Well currently the value is passed unchanged (and this is documented). I could reconsider this, but it won't change in the next days, as I just uploaded a new version.
… if you change it, you are basically lying.
I see your point, even though I probably wouldn’t express it quite so dramatically. It affects all dates, by the way, i.e. pdfdate
, pdfcreationdate
and pdfmoddate
. (pdfmetadate
no longer seems to work at all.) I understand how one could argue that the user shouldn't have to change those dates in the first place, but then it probably shouldn't be supported directly neither. What tripped me up was the different behavior between pdfauthor
and pdfdate
.
Well currently the value is passed unchanged (and this is documented). I could reconsider this, but it won't change in the next days, as I just uploaded a new version.
That's fine, and if you consider it documented behavior and a feature, so be it. Just wanted you to be aware of this.
pdfdate
is not a hyperref key. Its value is passed (unchanged) to hyperxmp, there is no pdfmetadate
key.
But yes, I think there isn't a reason not to expand the value, so I will change this.
This is fixed in newer versions.
When I create a PDF/A compliant document, I am unable to set the date via a command, like so:
Note how the behavior between pdfauthor and pdfcreationdate etc. is different. What gets written to the file is literally MyDate. pdfmoddate on the other hand works. Surely that's not by design?