Closed stone-zeng closed 6 years ago
Ah thanks. I'm reorganising this now to make it more clear what's going on.
It seems that you still forget the version information for the main unicode-math.sty
in v0.8h. :satisfied:
But for unicode-math-xetex.sty
and unicode-math-luatex.sty
, it's OK.
The sample log file:
(d:/Texlive/2017/texmf-dist/tex/latex/unicode-math/unicode-math.sty
(d:/Texlive/2017/texmf-dist/tex/latex/ucharcat/ucharcat.sty
Package: ucharcat 2015/11/19 v0.03 ucharcat for luaLaTeX (DPC)
\ucharcat@table=\catcodetable9
)
(d:/Texlive/2017/texmf-dist/tex/latex/filehook/filehook.sty
Package: filehook 2011/10/12 v0.5d Hooks for input files
)
(d:/Texlive/2017/texmf-dist/tex/latex/unicode-math/unicode-math-luatex.sty
Package: unicode-math-luatex 2017/10/09 v0.8h Unicode maths in XeLaTeX and LuaLaTeX
(d:/Texlive/2017/texmf-dist/tex/lualatex/lualatex-math/lualatex-math.sty
Package: lualatex-math 2017/06/15 v1.7 Patches for mathematics typesetting with LuaLaTeX
Lua module: lualatex-math 2013/08/03 1.3 Patches for mathematics typesetting with LuaLaTeX
...
Thanks — it's not that I forgot, it's that there was a bug in the code for generating those lines :)
It seems that you have comment some lines, so that there are no
\ProvidesPackage{...}
in the sty files.By the way, you use the label
package,XE\UMDEBUG
here, is that a typo?Version: v0.8g, 2017/10/02