Closed matteocoder closed 2 years ago
Cambria Math is actually correct, you need to scale it to enough size:
For small size your os may not render it smoothly.
But for XITS and STIX2, the problem is from the design of these fonts:
The value radicalRuleThickness
in XITS Math/STIXTwoMath is 66/68, while the actual thickness of the horizontal line in uni27CC
is 54/55, so you may expect the breaking point. For Cambria Math, however, this value is 133 (ignore the device table) and the line is 133 as well, so it goes fit.
Reference: https://docs.microsoft.com/typography/opentype/spec/math
Thanks for your thorough reply @stone-zeng . In this case, should I open an issue on the XITS and STIX repos?
Description
The line over the numbers or formula in a long division does not connect well to the u+027cc symbol.
Add info or delete as appropriate:
Minimal example demonstrating the issue
Further details
Setup: TeX Live 2019 for Windows, LuaTeX 1.10, XeTeX 3.14159265-2.6-0.999991, unicode-math 0.80.
Edit: here are the screenshots for the fonts mentioned previously: