Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
This should be marked as an enhancement, not a defect. If someone knows how to
switch that, please do so or let me know how.
Original comment by zmy...@gmail.com
on 6 Apr 2011 at 4:52
Original comment by vega113
on 7 Apr 2011 at 4:23
Some tips for someone that wants to handle this issue:
When a user clicks on the "delete" control on the blip menu the event is
handled in the MenuController.onMouseDown method. It then passes control to
ActionsImpl.delete method. That would be a good place to make user confirm the
blip deletion.
if (Window.confirm("Are you sure?")) {
...//delete blip logic
} else {
return;
}
Original comment by vega113
on 19 Apr 2011 at 9:20
If possible, I think it would be better to let the blip be deleted without
confirmation and instead have a bar with an undo button appear when the blip is
deleted (similar to Gmail). I realize that is probably more difficult, so it
may make sense to use a confirm() temporarily, but I (and most users) find it
nicer to not get a pop-up for every action.
Original comment by zmy...@gmail.com
on 19 Apr 2011 at 2:47
Copying GMail interface is usually a good idea.
In this case, I also suggest: shift+del to delete a blip (just like shift+enter
to enter a new blip), which should avoid accidental deletes.
Original comment by stenyak
on 19 Apr 2011 at 2:57
That could work. And it would feel natural to those of us who skip the
trash/recycle bin when deleting files.
Original comment by zmy...@gmail.com
on 19 Apr 2011 at 3:15
As a UX principle, I agree that it's better to allow actions to occur without
interruption, but provide subsequent steps to recover from mistakes (Undo).
However, undo is much more tricky in wave than GMail, because of liveness, OT,
and the independent concurrency domains for multiple conversations in the same
wave. It is certainly doable though (Google Wave does it to some degree, with
an UndoManager that's hooked up in many places). There's also two kinds of
undo (reset vs revert in git terminology), and decisions need to be made on
which kind can be used where.
In Google Wave, we never enabled a keyboard shortcut for blip deletion for
precisely this reason: there are modelling issues with undoing blip deletions,
which is why we never added an Undo message, and without it, the damage of
accidentally deleting a blip outweighed the convenience of having a single-key
way to do it.
+1 for shift+del instead of del. I also wouldn't object to removing the
keyboard shortcut for deletion altogether.
I can do this patch (unless anyone else jumps in an does it first, including
someone taking on a starter project).
Original comment by hearn...@google.com
on 20 Apr 2011 at 1:21
I'm willing to solve that but, should I implement the Undo system, change the
key binding or both?
Original comment by marcelos...@gmail.com
on 25 Apr 2011 at 9:07
I don't know what kind of time you are able to devote to this, but from what
has been said, I'd suggest to first start with replacing current shortcut
(change it to 'shift+del'), and *then* take a look at the 'undo' funcionality.
Original comment by stenyak
on 25 Apr 2011 at 9:52
I agree, you should change the keyboard shortcut to Shift+Del first since that
is relatively minor, but undo functionality would be event better.
Original comment by zmy...@gmail.com
on 25 Apr 2011 at 11:28
I haven't really worked with Wave's OT theory (just know the basics from
watching some youtubes), but I wonder if Darcs' patch theory concepts could be
of any help when applied to OTs, specially with regards to 'undo' functionality?
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Understanding_Darcs/Patch_theory
Original comment by stenyak
on 26 Apr 2011 at 6:05
I'll be working on this issue. I already submitted a patch that fixes the
problem with the delete key. Now a blip can only be deleted with the combo
shift+delete.
The undo functionality seems to be a much larger issue, that could incorporate
several other things such as adding or removing participants. Deleting blips
without sequence keys, and so on.
My suggestion is to integrate it with the replay functionality that Google Wave
still have.
What do you guys think?
Original comment by marcelos...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2011 at 9:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
zmy...@gmail.com
on 6 Apr 2011 at 4:51