Open gwwatkin opened 3 years ago
@isolatedinformation is already working on writing some unit tests for #48 and #44
@gwwatkin the issue description is too ambiguous, should we change this into something else?
I am thinking either a coverage % target or full coverage for critical components.
@alexnguyenn and @isolatedinformation,
A recap of what's done (please add something if it's missing):
I propose full coverage of critical components, so near 100% coverage of the following:
For later, maybe create a separate issue, since they are not critical to our workflow:
I would leave out for the moment the stuff about the dag and scheduling of operations
@gwwatkin this looks great to me. Might want to include the new goals in the description.
:+1: Added
What's done:
181
168
I propose full coverage of critical components, so near 100% coverage of the following:
48
For later, maybe create a separate issue, since they are not critical to our workflow:
I would leave out for the moment the stuff about the dag and scheduling of operations