gtm connect is a bit misleading

laughedelic / gtm

:stopwatch: git task/time manager

86 stars 10 forks source link

gtm connect is a bit misleading #65

Closed marina-manrique closed 10 years ago

marina-manrique commented 10 years ago

Maybe it's my lack of git experience but this command is a bit misleading to me, at first sight I expect to connect to somewhere somehow...

gtm connect [options]     -- transform bound issue to pull-request if possible

eparejatobes commented 10 years ago

the name is a bit confusing for me too

laughedelic commented 10 years ago

Is it just about name or about the concept? Because the last seems to me quite confusing too

laughedelic commented 10 years ago

hm, I have an idea: what if gtm would do this pull-rewuest transformation when you do gtm push? So user should worry about this github specific.

eparejatobes commented 10 years ago

that's what I was about to suggest, but then one issue could be the amount of noise

laughedelic commented 10 years ago

I see two ways:

do it only on first gtm push somehow (not nice because needs to store the state)
suppress it's output (not nice in case of meaningful error)

marina-manrique commented 10 years ago

@laughedelic to me it's about the name, and I think I agree with you both on doing this with gtm push, provided you are not forced to merge the push request, I don't know if what I say makes some sense...

laughedelic commented 10 years ago

yes, your are not forced to merge it. but I wo uld leave this command separately as a way of doing it manually (just in case), then which name wou ld you suggest?

marina-manrique commented 10 years ago

gtm transform maybe? @eparejatobes some ideas?

laughedelic commented 10 years ago

gtm pull-request ?

eparejatobes commented 10 years ago

gtm morph
gtm transform-issue-into-pull-request-if-possible
gtm pullrequestify
gtm do-something-with-this-there-at-github
gtm fun-times
gtm digivolve

laughedelic commented 10 years ago

haha! :+1: @eparejatobes you are really creative today ") I like gtm pullrequestify ")

marina-manrique commented 10 years ago

I prefer gtm pull-request....

eparejatobes commented 10 years ago

now seriously, pull-request is a bit too generic maybe, what about to-pull-request?

marina-manrique commented 10 years ago

gtm issue-to-pull-request?

to-pull-request would also be fine for me

laughedelic commented 10 years ago

Update to the v0.9.0 — it has both the alias and the auto-connecting on the first push.

eparejatobes commented 10 years ago

@laughedelic great! truth is, I could not work without gtm anymore :+1: