Closed scottcorgan closed 6 years ago
Very sorry about this. It looks like the wrong function name got into the code during a refactoring, and we did not have adequate test coverage here. I'll have a patch release out shortly.
(FYI, in order for it to get to this particular code, there has to be something invalid about the feature flag being evaluated - for instance, a rule that specifies a nonexistent variation index. So you may want to take a look at your flags to make sure they have the properties you expect them to have. Of course, the proper behavior of the SDK in such a case would be to return the default value and write a warning to the log, not to throw an exception.)
This is fixed in 5.4.1. Please let us know if you see anything like it again.
After an upgrade to the latest (
5.4.0
) client and during the incident today, we started getting this error.Let me know if you need more information.