Closed pahbs closed 3 years ago
It's was about $0.5 for the 1 degree test area. So yes we can easily do $5 of more data. Just make a list of Albers tile ids to use, which are actually smaller than 1 degree tiles previously used.
lets go with
The data for 40818, 40819, 40350
may already be covered by the existing sample2, @nmt28 can you check?
Question: should we convert the notebook to a python script for this stage of testing, to start aligning it with how a DPS job would be run?
Will take a look now. Happy to start using python scripts.
After fixing a projection issue in the tileid layer, the new tileids corresponding are listed below. We can probably reduce that number a bit, as these tiles are a slightly different size. sample3.geojson.txt 1073 1074 1075 1132 1133 17400 17401 17613 17614 17615 21961 22199 22200 30542 30543 30821 30822 30823 31099 31100 31101 34371 34650
@pahbs The core testing block is to try in DPS covered by pre-cached sample2 30542 30543 30821 30822 30823
Noting that 34371,34650 are on the dateline and will be set aside to test handling of reprojection on the edge.
Current test area tiles are:
@wildintellect Do you think we can pull the data for 30821? That way we have nice quadrant of data to use as the test area?
Closing, in deference to trying to get direct AWS access in Ops now. Should not need to pull any more sample data.
This is a test of the Landsat compositing across a variety of extents in the boreal domain. Number of extents to test depends on cost. At least 5 other locations in addition to the one we've been using, distributed across AK and Canada?