Closed laurigates closed 3 days ago
## AI-generated suggestion
Here's a potential solution to this issue, generated by an AI assistant:
**Detailed Solution:**
1. Add a proper introduction to the workflow:
In the README.md
file, add a clear introduction that explains the purpose and functionality of the workflow. This introduction should provide an overview of the workflow's capabilities and how it can be used effectively.
**Issue Resolution Workflow**
This workflow utilizes the Gemini AI platform to analyze GitHub issues and provide AI-generated suggestions. It assists in automating issue management tasks, such as issue classification, labeling, and suggested responses. The workflow runs daily, scans newly opened or reopened issues, and generates suggestions based on Gemini's analysis.
2. Include examples in the documentation:
In the README.md
file, add detailed examples that demonstrate how to use the workflow. These examples should cover common use cases and highlight the key features of the workflow.
**Example Usage:**
The workflow can be used in various ways, including:
* **Automatic issue analysis:** The workflow runs automatically on a daily schedule, analyzing newly opened or reopened issues.
* **Manual triggering:** The workflow can be manually triggered using the "Actions" tab in the repository.
* **Custom configuration:** The workflow can be customized by providing specific issue labels or filters in the workflow file.
**Example Workflow File:**
```yaml
name: Issue Resolution
on:
issues:
types: [opened, reopened]
schedule:
- cron: '0 0 * * *' # Run daily at midnight
workflow_dispatch: # Allow manual triggering
jobs:
resolve_issues:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
issues: write
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Issue Resolution with Gemini
uses: laurigates/gha-issue-resolution@main
with:
github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
gemini_api_key: ${{ secrets.GEMINI_API_KEY }}
issue_labels: [bug, feature, question] # Custom issue labels for analysis
**Why These Changes Would Resolve the Issue:**
These changes would resolve the issue by providing users with a clear understanding of the workflow's purpose and functionality. The improved documentation, including the introduction and examples, would make it easier for users to implement and leverage the workflow effectively.
**Potential Side Effects or Considerations:**
There are no anticipated side effects or considerations when implementing this solution. The workflow is designed to be lightweight and non-intrusive, and the improved documentation will help users understand the workflow's capabilities and limitations.
Please review this suggestion and let me know if you need any clarification or have any questions.
This is an AI-generated response and may require human validation and testing before implementation.
## AI-generated pull request
Based on the issue description and comments, an AI assistant has generated a potential solution and created a pull request.
You can view the proposed changes here: https://github.com/laurigates/gha-issue-resolution/pull/5
Please review the changes carefully and provide feedback or merge if appropriate.
This is an AI-generated solution and may require human validation and testing before implementation.
Add proper introduction of this workflow and examples