search

layer5io / meshery-performance-action

GitHub Action for pipelining microservices and Kubernetes performance testing with Meshery
https://layer5.io/projects/nighthawk
Apache License 2.0
29 stars 22 forks source link

CI action error due to inaccessibility of k8s cluster #68

Closed alphaX86 closed 1 year ago

alphaX86 commented 2 years ago

Description

Meshery SMP Action is failing on some CI runs due to inaccessibility of k8s cluster present in the workflow

Expected Behavior

The error must be rectified and CI run should be free of errors

gyohuangxin commented 2 years ago

@alphaX86 Thank you very much.

gyohuangxin commented 2 years ago

@alphaX86 oops, the actions failed: https://github.com/layer5io/meshery-smp-action/actions/runs/3407625025/jobs/5667478085#step:3:79

alphaX86 commented 2 years ago

From the logs it shows that it didn't have permission to extract files 😭 oh damn.... Should we try an alternative CI function for this? Or shall we wait for subsequent CI action runs to see results?

gyohuangxin commented 2 years ago

@alphaX86 I give you the maintain access to this repo, you can run a configurable benchmark test on self-hosted runner if it works.

alphaX86 commented 1 year ago

👀👀 ok, will do 👍

gyohuangxin commented 1 year ago

@alphaX86 Do you have any updates?

alphaX86 commented 1 year ago

I ran the CI action on the repo and checked. Seems its an error on the permissions for extracting installation files during k8s setup. IDK what exactly causes this. I referred this in net and as per the suggestions I even re-ran the action. No joy :/

Likely we might need to change the k8s action to test it. What's your opinion? @gyohuangxin

gyohuangxin commented 1 year ago

@alphaX86 Please go ahead, the only difference is the version of manusa/actions-setup-minikube, so IMO maybe you can research what's changeed in the new version.

alphaX86 commented 1 year ago

~For CIL cluster, seems it's restricted to use actions within it. Similar error is also caused in this repo I saw... https://github.com/engineerd/setup-kind/issues/13 Seems manual method is the way for solving in case of self-hosted runners :/~

NVM, I think I got a mere idea now

stale[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.