Closed gyohuangxin closed 1 year ago
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Is this still an open need?
@leecalcote I think yes, this issue is to make machine type can be configurable rather than hardcoding as "c3.small.x86". @hershd23 If you're around, can you look at this?
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.
Thank you for reopening.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.
Current Behavior
We had an implementation of running SMP on self-hosted runner #39 , but the configuration of self-hosted runner is hardcoded as "c3.small.x86".
Desired Behavior
We should make self-hosted runner configurable as the workflow's options, e.g. server type, location......
Implementation
Acceptance Tests
Mockups
Contributor Guide