Closed pcaspers closed 7 years ago
@pcaspers I think #112 (and especially this lines https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib/pull/112/files#diff-9306c6cf37e9d11df4f1cc28e2a33c1dL101) should take care of that.
It does, as far as the CDS helper is concerned---thanks Michael, good find. That code could probably be moved to a new generation rule for the Schedule
class, as Peter suggested.
Just updating the line reference, since the first one doesn't seem to work. Use this Link:. By the way: does anyone know a better way of referencing code lines from a different PR?
Thanks Michael @mdriesch, didn't see that. I would also say let's make it a new date generation rule so that it can be used in the helpers and the instrument (and who knows where)
Since December 2015
http://www2.isda.org/asset-classes/credit-derivatives/single-name-cds-roll
single name standard CDS contracts change their rolling frequency from 3m to 6m. For index CDS this was already the standard before. I believe we need a new date generation rule to be able to construct the associated schedules correctly.