Open lbelzile opened 3 years ago
It is easy to scale threshold exceedances / do a location/scale normalization of the maxima, but must then back-transform the output before computing standard errors, log-likelihood, etc.
This would require some checks to make sure it indeed improves the optimization in fit.gpd
, etc.
The problem is reported in a particular function that uses it's own routines (it's now possible to fix parameters with the latest versions), but none of the profiling functions does this).
Reported by John Ery.
This error is caused by unscaled features (approximately
10e9
); the numerical tolerance is too small, leading to lack of convergence in the optimizer and warning/failure of the routine.Perhaps it would make sense to scale data first before computing and using location-scale properties to give back the estimates.