Open ssiccha opened 5 years ago
I don't really understand what you mean.
Changing IsHPC
to UseHPC
sounds good to me. Do we want to change it in Chief
, too?
Yeah, I didn't write my thoughts up clearly. What I meant is: We use, what is now called IsHPC
, to tell the algorithm whether to use the parallel or the sequential code path. I suggested to rename that variable to UseHPC
.
Now that I think about it though, I think we should postpone this issue until we're done with milestone 0.2. It may well happen that after 0.2 we get rid of IsHPC
completely. Then there's no need to rename that variable in all our *.g
and *.tst
files.
Now that we have changed the implementation we can't use a sequential version of this algorithm in HPC-GAP anymore. At least not without jumping through some hoops. So let's remove this parameter.
~IsHPC kind of sounds like IsHPCGAP although for now we also want to use the variable
IsHPC
in GAP to tell it to use the parallel code path.~