[X] I checked the next branch to see if the feature has already been implemented
[X] I searched existing reports to see if it is already requested.
What is the user problem or growth opportunity you want to see solved?
Rofi should support the standard ext-foreign-toplevel-list (introduced in wayland-protocols 1.32) in addition to wlr-foreign-toplevel-management.
How do you know that this problem exists today? Why is this important?
lswt supports both, preferring ext-foreign-toplevel-list. Rofi could do the same. I've considered implementing it myself and sending a PR but I'd like to know it would be accepted before going to the trouble.
Who will benefit from it?
Anyone using a Wayland compositor that doesn't support the proprietary wlr-foreign-toplevel-management protocol.
Before opening a feature request
What is the user problem or growth opportunity you want to see solved?
Rofi should support the standard ext-foreign-toplevel-list (introduced in wayland-protocols 1.32) in addition to wlr-foreign-toplevel-management.
How do you know that this problem exists today? Why is this important?
lswt supports both, preferring ext-foreign-toplevel-list. Rofi could do the same. I've considered implementing it myself and sending a PR but I'd like to know it would be accepted before going to the trouble.
Who will benefit from it?
Anyone using a Wayland compositor that doesn't support the proprietary wlr-foreign-toplevel-management protocol.
Rofi version (rofi -v)
Version: 1.7.5+wayland3
Configuration
https://gist.github.com/keithbowes/311ea3b89cabc843795954dffdfbf7e9#file-rofi-gist
Additional information
I don't know why I need to go to the trouble of creating a Gist when this doesn't depend on configuration, but OK.