With the new hubs, clients still see variable_decay as the trending algorithm when they run lbrynet status. However that name is only appropriate for the old algorithm. It might be an appropriate name again in the future, but until then hubs should say the correct thing. I suggested fast_ar as the name for the current trending algorithm since it is similar to the old ar but faster in the sense that trending values respond instantaneously to LBC changes.
Coverage increased (+0.006%) to 68.698% when pulling 9b1da72890054eb6f1f32e6e412fd31528059a55 on eggplantbren:trending_name_correction into 1e00fb369d31fac980fc239b17a2834cb0631a50 on lbryio:master.
With the new hubs, clients still see
variable_decay
as the trending algorithm when they runlbrynet status
. However that name is only appropriate for the old algorithm. It might be an appropriate name again in the future, but until then hubs should say the correct thing. I suggestedfast_ar
as the name for the current trending algorithm since it is similar to the oldar
but faster in the sense that trending values respond instantaneously to LBC changes.