Closed winder closed 6 years ago
@winder , thanks for this contribution! Please review our contributing guide if you have not done so already. Also, click here if you are interested in an LBC tip for your work :)
We'll also be adding you to our developer mailing list so we can keep in touch (you can unsubscribe anytime!).
We'll get a proper review on this PR from one of the devs.
@kaykurokawa I think everything should be good now.
The style needs to be addressed (clang-format).
I wasn’t sure what to do about the failing builds. There error messages are sort of hidden inside the reproducible build script.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:07 PM lbrynaut notifications@github.com wrote:
@lbrynaut requested changes on this pull request.
Looks good to me other than the failing travis builds.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/lbryio/lbrycrd/pull/167#pullrequestreview-136077600, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHqRTFmInJYsYC6D-ZeUjWMnIvU_p12ks5uFWvigaJpZM4U-HPC .
I will rebase/squash/fix the travis errors and merge. Thanks for the contribution!
rebased/formatted/squashed and merged
Change for issue #125
I wasn't exactly sure how you deal with upstream test changes, but I'm pretty sure this isn't it. For now, I went ahead and updated the existing
rpc_tests
suite instead of copying over the CallRPC utility. Is there a better spot, or approach?