Closed bvbfan closed 3 years ago
The original list of that must be included in the fork:
It was decided that item 2 could be done by enforcing it at the mempool level only. The name enforcement does not need to become part of consensus. Hence, it technically doesn't need a fork.
It appears that item 1 is not in this changeset? Actually, it looks like we simply need to set the nMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight. (We also need to set the other effective heights for this fork.)
The maximum metadata size should probably be doubled. No more than that.
It's future hard fork request to ensure:
=&#:$@%?;\/"<>*\n\t\r\b\0
in claim nameAdjust consensus parameter
nClaimInfoInMerkleForkHeight
to allow it in production as well asnMaxRemovalWorkaroundHeight
to purge out implementation detail bug which allow addition of claim without delay, see comments for more details.