Open lckjosh opened 11 months ago
Indeed, to make the application more foolproof we could have made things non-case sensitive!
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Unhomogene case sensitivity
In the add command, the two species are considered differents (otherwise i could'nt have edited the second to create a duplicate) but in the summary, the species are considered equivalent.
[original: nus-cs2113-AY2324S1/pe-interim#970] [original labels: type.FunctionalityBug severity.Low]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Thank you for your response.
Will take note of this, and make the necessary improvements in the future.We have marked this as a duplicate of issue #920 as this is an issue not with the
summary
command, but rather theadd
command's case sensitivity.Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Steps to reproduce: Add an animal once Then add the same animal again but change the capitalisation of the name The animal will be added
Expected: The animal should not be added due to the constraint. Perhaps removing the constraint would be better