Closed YAY-C closed 1 month ago
> I just realized I should do the same for spahm-b, let me know if you want both in a new PR!
And I was thinking maybe in the
main()
we should enforce and warn about the need forecp
argument when using minao with elements heavier than Y. What do you think?
yes to both! but yeah probably this ecp stuff should be separate
Originally posted by @briling in https://github.com/lcmd-epfl/Q-stack/issues/39#issuecomment-2099007875
cherry-picked changes for spahm-a from #39 (811d0bf)
ecp
arguments to the CLI parser (for both SPAHM-a and SPAHM-b)ecp
whenminao
is used andargs.elements
contains atoms with Z>39