I'm looking at a misalignment of what is presently in the BF ontology and what the converter (BF2MARC v2.7) expects. The current https://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/date.rdf has a literal value as the range.
However, the converter (2.7) from BF to MARC seems to expects the following in the provision activity:
Seems to be an edtf datatype issue.
I'm looking at a misalignment of what is presently in the BF ontology and what the converter (BF2MARC v2.7) expects. The current https://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/date.rdf has a literal value as the range.
However, the converter (2.7) from BF to MARC seems to expects the following in the provision activity:
in order to generate this MARC:
<marc:controlfield xml:space="preserve" tag="008">240826m19601961dk a 00| 0|eng </marc:controlfield>