Closed kirkhess closed 6 months ago
The Eidr class is a little odd since it has both a bflc and a bf version: http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bflc/Eidr http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/Eidr
See https://github.com/lcnetdev/bibframe-ontology/issues/78
In the bf2marc conversion it refers to the bflc version defining the indicator and then both when populating the $2:
bflc
bflc and bf
A few different ways to go - it seems like the bflc version could be deprecated and you could just use bf:Eidr?
The bf2marc conversion specs only use bf:Eidr. Looks like the conversion needs to be updated to match.
This issue has been fixed in marc2bibframe v2.5
The Eidr class is a little odd since it has both a bflc and a bf version: http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bflc/Eidr http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/Eidr
See https://github.com/lcnetdev/bibframe-ontology/issues/78
In the bf2marc conversion it refers to the bflc version defining the indicator and then both when populating the $2:
bflc
bflc and bf
A few different ways to go - it seems like the bflc version could be deprecated and you could just use bf:Eidr?